DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelKA
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement997 cc
75 HPPower80 HP
95 NmTorque100 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
14Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4254 mm
1682 mmWidth1695 mm
1453 mmHeight1460 mm
1050 kgWeight1022 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford KA

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…