DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

63.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelFocus
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
184 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
210 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank53 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3972 mmLength4534 mm
1682 mmWidth1823 mm
1453 mmHeight1484 mm
1152 kgWeight1339 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2648 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford Focus

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…