DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Ampera vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Ampera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

63.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeVolkswagen
AmperaModelPolo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
161 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
86 HPPower90 HP
370 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,2 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4498 mmLength3972 mm
1787 mmWidth1682 mm
1439 mmHeight1453 mm
—Weight1152 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2685 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Opel Ampera

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Ampera and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Ampera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…