2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Mazda Xedos 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Xedos 6
Mazda Xedos 6 1.6 16V (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Xedos 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda Xedos 6
VolkswagenMakeMazda
PoloModelXedos 6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda Xedos 6
11,1 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
180 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower107 HP
152 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda Xedos 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda Xedos 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda Xedos 6
4164 mmLength4560 mm
1640 mmWidth1700 mm
1414 mmHeight1355 mm
1100 KgWeight1140 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Mazda Xedos 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Xedos 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…