2000 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
DaewooMakeVolkswagen
RezzoModelPolo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
12,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
101 HPPower97 HP
146 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4350 mmLength4164 mm
1755 mmWidth1640 mm
1580 mmHeight1414 mm
1230 KgWeight1100 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2441 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Rezzo and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…