2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Focus
VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelFocus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Focus
11,1 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
97 HPPower100 HP
152 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFord Focus
4164 mmLength4152 mm
1640 mmWidth1698 mm
1414 mmHeight1430 mm
1100 KgWeight1070 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…