2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Fiat Siena Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Siena
Fiat Siena 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Siena
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFiat Siena
VolkswagenMakeFiat
PoloModelSiena
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFiat Siena
11,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
180 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
97 HPPower103 HP
152 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFiat Siena
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFiat Siena
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationFiat Siena
4164 mmLength4100 mm
1640 mmWidth1614 mm
1414 mmHeight1440 mm
1100 KgWeight1065 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Fiat Siena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Siena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…