2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
VolkswagenMakeDaewoo
PoloModelRezzo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
11,1 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
97 HPPower101 HP
152 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4164 mmLength4350 mm
1640 mmWidth1755 mm
1414 mmHeight1580 mm
1100 KgWeight1230 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…