2009 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.6 TDI (75 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
2009 Volkswagen Polo vs 2009 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 1.9 TDI (75 Hp) 2009Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PoloModelCaddy
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
3Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
14,0 s0–100 km/h17,7 s
170 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
195 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
3970 mmLength4405 mm
1682 mmWidth1802 mm
1485 mmHeight1833 mm
1157 KgWeight1505-1626 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2682 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volkswagen Polo and 2009 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…