2009 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
2009 Ford C-Max vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.6 TDI (75 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
C-MaxModelPolo
2009Model year2009
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
12,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower75 HP
143 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4372 mmLength3970 mm
1825 mmWidth1682 mm
1595 mmHeight1485 mm
1344 KgWeight1157 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford C-Max and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…