DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Ford EcoSport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford EcoSport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelEcoSport
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h13,3 s
178 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
90 HPPower112 HP
155 NmTorque140 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4273 mm
1699 mmWidth1765 mm
1467 mmHeight1648 mm
1163 KgWeight1351 Kg
2553 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…