DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolkswagen
SpaceTourerModelPolo
2016Model year2016
Minivan, MPVBody typeSedan
8/9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
145 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
210 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16; 225/55 R17; 215/60 R17Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4956 mmLength4390 mm
1920 mmWidth1699 mm
1930 mmHeight1467 mm
1545-1553 KgWeight1163 Kg
3275 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…