DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Buick Regal vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Buick RegalSpecificationMG ZS
BuickMakeMG
RegalModelZS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Buick RegalSpecificationMG ZS
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
170 km/hTop speed19 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
124 HPPower117 HP
180 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Buick RegalSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Buick RegalSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Buick RegalSpecificationMG ZS
4923 mmLength4520 mm
1845 mmWidth1700 mm
1465 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight1125 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Buick Regal and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…