2003 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 1.8 16V (117 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.2 (124 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
MG ZSSpecificationBuick Regal
MGMakeBuick
ZSModelRegal
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
MG ZSSpecificationBuick Regal
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
19 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
117 HPPower124 HP
160 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
MG ZSSpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
MG ZSSpecificationBuick Regal
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
MG ZSSpecificationBuick Regal
4520 mmLength4923 mm
1700 mmWidth1845 mm
1390 mmHeight1465 mm
1125 KgWeight—
2620 mmWheelbase2769 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 MG ZS and 2003 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Focus vs MG ZS2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableRenault Scenic vs MG ZS2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Bluebird vs MG ZS2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG TF vs MG ZS2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG ZT vs MG ZS2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…