DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
PoloModelFigo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
125 HPPower112 HP
155 NmTorque136 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength3995 mm
1699 mmWidth1695 mm
1467 mmHeight1525 mm
1223 KgWeight—
2553 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…