DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeVolkswagen
ZRModelPolo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
179 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
103 HPPower80 HP
123 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength3743 mm
1690 mmWidth1632 mm
1400 mmHeight1418 mm
1060 KgWeight1035 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…