2003 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI (80 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Volkswagen Polo vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMG ZR
VolkswagenMakeMG
PoloModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMG ZR
13,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
80 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMG ZR
3743 mmLength4011 mm
1632 mmWidth1690 mm
1418 mmHeight1400 mm
1035 KgWeight1060 Kg
2407 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volkswagen Polo and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…