DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Buick Reatta vs 1990 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
ReattaModelThunderbird
1990Model year1990
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
173 HPPower141 HP
298 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank72 lt
17 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size205/70 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength5088 mm
1855 mmWidth1847 mm
1310 mmHeight1333 mm
1630 KgWeight1619 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Buick Reatta and 1990 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…