DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Ford Thunderbird vs 1990 Buick Reatta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
ThunderbirdModelReatta
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
141 HPPower173 HP
292 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/70 R15 HTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4640 mm
1847 mmWidth1855 mm
1333 mmHeight1310 mm
1619 KgWeight1630 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Ford Thunderbird and 1990 Buick Reatta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…