DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSkoda
PoloModelRapid Spaceback
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
187 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
250 NmTorque230 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,4 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
215/40 R17Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3987 mmLength4304 mm
1698 mmWidth1706 mm
1488 mmHeight1459 mm
1139 KgWeight1229 kg
—Luggage capacity384 lt
2469 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…