DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Xpander vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
XpanderModelPolo
2017Model year2017
MPVBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
141 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength3987 mm
1750 mmWidth1698 mm
1695 mmHeight1488 mm
1780 KgWeight1139 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2469 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Xpander and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…