DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volkswagen Phaeton vs 2004 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Phaeton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeCadillac
PhaetonModelCTS
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
245 km/hTop speed238 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
241 HPPower223 HP
315 NmTorque296 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank66 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4828 mm
1903 mmWidth1793 mm
1450 mmHeight1440 mm
1995 KgWeight1628 Kg
2881 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volkswagen Phaeton and 2004 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Phaeton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…