DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac CTS vs 2006 Volkswagen Phaeton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Phaeton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolkswagen
CTSModelPhaeton
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
238 km/hTop speed245 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
223 HPPower241 HP
296 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank90 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength5055 mm
1793 mmWidth1903 mm
1440 mmHeight1450 mm
1628 KgWeight1995 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2881 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac CTS and 2006 Volkswagen Phaeton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Phaeton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…