DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Passat vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRover
PassatModel25
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
195 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength3990 mm
1746 mmWidth1688 mm
1462 mmHeight1419 mm
1365 KgWeight1130 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Passat and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…