DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolkswagen
Z3ModelPassat
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
196 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
118 HPPower131 HP
190 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4703 mm
1740 mmWidth1746 mm
1288 mmHeight1462 mm
1220 KgWeight1365 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…