DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Buick Park Avenue vs 1996 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
Park AvenueModelEconoline
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3785 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
205 HPPower197 HP
324 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16 VTyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5220 mmLength5382 mm
1883 mmWidth2014 mm
1410 mmHeight2050 mm
1604 KgWeight2370 Kg
2814 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Buick Park Avenue and 1996 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…