DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Econoline vs 1996 Buick Park Avenue Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
EconolineModelPark Avenue
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
160 km/hTop speed203 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement3785 cc
197 HPPower205 HP
339 NmTorque324 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size215/60 R16 V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength5220 mm
2014 mmWidth1883 mm
2050 mmHeight1410 mm
2370 KgWeight1604 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2814 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Econoline and 1996 Buick Park Avenue approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…