DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 AC Cobra vs 1999 AC ACE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC CobraSpecificationAC ACE
ACMakeAC
CobraModelACE
2001Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

AC CobraSpecificationAC ACE
5,3 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
370 HPPower326 HP
579 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

AC CobraSpecificationAC ACE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank90 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC CobraSpecificationAC ACE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/65 VR15Tyre size235/45 ZR17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

AC CobraSpecificationAC ACE
4200 mmLength4420 mm
1746 mmWidth1870 mm
1200 mmHeight1300 mm
900 KgWeight1510 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 AC Cobra and 1999 AC ACE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…