DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 AC ACE vs 2001 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC ACESpecificationAC Cobra
ACMakeAC
ACEModelCobra
1999Model year2001
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

AC ACESpecificationAC Cobra
5,7 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
326 HPPower370 HP
427 NmTorque579 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

AC ACESpecificationAC Cobra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

AC ACESpecificationAC Cobra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/45 ZR17Tyre size225/65 VR15
YesABS—

Dimensions

AC ACESpecificationAC Cobra
4420 mmLength4200 mm
1870 mmWidth1746 mm
1300 mmHeight1200 mm
1510 KgWeight900 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 AC ACE and 2001 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…