DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Eos vs 2009 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeJaguar
EosModelXJ
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
247 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3168 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
250 HPPower275 HP
330 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4407 mmLength—
1791 mmWidth—
1443 mmHeight—
1539 KgWeight—
2578 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Eos and 2009 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…