DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar XJ vs 2009 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolkswagen
XJModelEos
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
250 km/hTop speed247 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3168 cc
275 HPPower250 HP
0 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4407 mm
—Width1791 mm
—Height1443 mm
—Weight1539 Kg
—Wheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar XJ and 2009 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…