DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Eos vs 2010 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Eos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeNissan
EosModelX-Trail
2010Model year2010
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
238 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
210 HPPower173 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R16; 235/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4630 mm
1791 mmWidth1785 mm
1444 mmHeight1685 mm
1563 KgWeight1651 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Eos and 2010 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Eos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…