2010 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.0 dCi (173 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Nissan X-Trail vs 2010 Volkswagen Eos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Eos
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI (210 Hp) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Eos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
NissanMakeVolkswagen
X-TrailModelEos
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
10,0 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
200 km/hTop speed238 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
173 HPPower210 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
4630 mmLength4423 mm
1785 mmWidth1791 mm
1685 mmHeight1444 mm
1651 KgWeight1563 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan X-Trail and 2010 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Eos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…