DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
CaddyModelPolo
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeSedan
2Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
151 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
225 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4408 mmLength4390 mm
1794 mmWidth1699 mm
1823 mmHeight1467 mm
1383 KgWeight1163 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Caddy and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…