DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PoloModelCaddy
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
178 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
155 NmTorque225 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4408 mm
1699 mmWidth1794 mm
1467 mmHeight1823 mm
1163 KgWeight1383 Kg
2553 mmWheelbase2682 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…