DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
CaddyModelC30
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 DSGGears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4266 mm
1794 mmWidth1782 mm
1823 mmHeight1447 mm
1588 KgWeight1451 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Caddy and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…