2010 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.25/100
2010 BMW X3 vs 2010 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 TDI (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
BMWMakeVolkswagen
X3ModelCaddy
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
11,5 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
198 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
200 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 DSG
215/60 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4569 mmLength4406 mm
1853 mmWidth1794 mm
1674 mmHeight1823 mm
1655 KgWeight1588 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2681 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 BMW X3 and 2010 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…