DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2010 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeBMW
CaddyModelX3
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
196 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 DSGGears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4569 mm
1794 mmWidth1853 mm
1823 mmHeight1674 mm
1588 KgWeight1655 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Caddy and 2010 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…