DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
CaddyModelC30
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
169 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / CNGFuel typeDiesel
13 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4266 mm
1794 mmWidth1782 mm
1823 mmHeight1447 mm
1568 KgWeight1354 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Caddy and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…