2012 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 F (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo V50 vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 (109 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V50ModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
9,6 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
0 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower109 HP
185 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
55 ltFuel tank13 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4522 mmLength4406 mm
1845 mmWidth1794 mm
1457 mmHeight1823 mm
1381 KgWeight1568 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2681 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo V50 and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…