DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
CaddyModelPolo
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

17,7 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
150 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
210 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength3970 mm
1802 mmWidth1682 mm
1833 mmHeight1485 mm
1505-1626 KgWeight1157 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Caddy and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…