DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Brilliance M2 vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeLand Rover
M2ModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
210 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
130 HPPower117 HP
173 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4368 mm
1800 mmWidth1809 mm
1450 mmHeight1708 mm
1455 KgWeight1510 Kg
—Wheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Brilliance M2 and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…