DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBrilliance
FreelanderModelM2
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower130 HP
160 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4648 mm
1809 mmWidth1800 mm
1708 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1455 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…