DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Cobra vs 1999 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC CobraSpecificationAlpina B10
ACMakeAlpina
CobraModelB10
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

AC CobraSpecificationAlpina B10
5,3 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
250 km/hTop speed269 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
370 HPPower347 HP
579 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

AC CobraSpecificationAlpina B10
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC CobraSpecificationAlpina B10
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/65 VR15Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

AC CobraSpecificationAlpina B10
4200 mmLength4805 mm
1746 mmWidth1800 mm
1200 mmHeight1420 mm
900 KgWeight1800 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Cobra and 1999 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…