DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Alpina B10 vs 2000 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B10SpecificationAC Cobra
AlpinaMakeAC
B10ModelCobra
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Alpina B10SpecificationAC Cobra
5,7 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
269 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4619 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
347 HPPower370 HP
480 NmTorque579 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B10SpecificationAC Cobra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
19,4 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B10SpecificationAC Cobra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size225/65 VR15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Alpina B10SpecificationAC Cobra
4805 mmLength4200 mm
1800 mmWidth1746 mm
1420 mmHeight1200 mm
1800 KgWeight900 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Alpina B10 and 2000 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…