DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Bora vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeNissan
BoraModelCedric
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
175 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
68 HPPower85 HP
133 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4376 mmLength4690 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1446 mmHeight1445 mm
1265 KgWeight1480 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Bora and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…