DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2004 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
CedricModelBora
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
157 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
85 HPPower68 HP
170 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4376 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1445 mmHeight1446 mm
1480 KgWeight1265 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cedric and 2004 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…