DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Brilliance M2 vs 2009 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeSeat
M2ModelAltea
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
210 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
134 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91H; 205/55 R16 91V; 225/45 R17 91W; 225/40 R18 92Y
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4282 mm
1800 mmWidth1768 mm
1450 mmHeight1576 mm
1455 KgWeight1455 Kg
—Wheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Brilliance M2 and 2009 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…