DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Seat Altea vs 2009 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeBrilliance
AlteaModelM2
2009Model year2009
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
183 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
250 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank74 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15 91H; 205/55 R16 91V; 225/45 R17 91W; 225/40 R18 92YTyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4282 mmLength4648 mm
1768 mmWidth1800 mm
1576 mmHeight1450 mm
1455 KgWeight1455 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Seat Altea and 2009 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…