DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Brilliance M2 vs 2009 Fiat Linea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Linea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeFiat
M2ModelLinea
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
134 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15 T; 195/60 R15 H; 195/55 R16 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4560 mm
1800 mmWidth1946 mm
1450 mmHeight1494 mm
1455 KgWeight1290 Kg
—Wheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Brilliance M2 and 2009 Fiat Linea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Linea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…